Low-functioning autism is a myth.
Every autistic individual has potential, and our fate depends on whether this potential is recognised and nourished or buried under attempts to make us appear less autistic.
The labels ‘high-functioning’ and ‘low-functioning autism’ are both misleading and demeaning. The ‘high-functioning’ label dismisses our struggles, anxieties and frustrations in trying to adapt to a strange society and its rules, while the ‘low-functioning’ label dismisses entirely the enormous potential of every autistic individual - and what you don’t look for you won’t find. It is no surprise that the ‘severity’ of autism, i.e. the difference between ‘low- and high-functioning autism’, has been linked to the experienced stress levels in recent studies which indicates that the more we are put under pressure, the ‘lower-functioning’ we become. Furthermore, would you label a 3 year old who doesn’t speak but solves a Rubik’s Cube in two minutes as high- or as low-functioning?
The two greatest dangers autistic children face are being pressured, and being written off. We develop at our own speed, and we thrive with encouragement as much as we break under pressure. And when non-autistic ‘specialists’, or even our own parents, give up on us and claim that we will never be able to speak, tie our laces, graduate from school etc, we have a tendency to trust their judgment and cease trying. Researcher Bill Jenson observed that 'if you drop your expectation level for a child with autism, they will drop to that level.’ And researchers Martha R. Leary and Anne M. Donnellan commented, ‘In our field, assumptions about labeled people are so deeply rooted that we tend to think they are facts. They are not – they are only shared beliefs.’ (From their book Autism: Sensory-Movement Differences and Diversity.)
I’m sure you have heard of the cases of supposedly ‘low-functioning’ and ‘severely’ autistic children who surprised everybody with their abilities, often after finding alternative ways to communicate. In fact, there are so many cases that they can’t be considered exceptions any more; on the contrary, they indicate that all autistic children have the potential to develop and thrive in a supportive environment in which their interests and talents are encouraged rather than one in which their autistic identities are suppressed and ‘corrected’.
Presuming competence is the key to both happy parenthood and a happy childhood.
This is a list of some of the many children who were written off as low-functioning, and who proved everybody wrong:
Donald Gray Triplett: When he was a toddler, autism had not been defined yet. His odd and withdrawn behaviour as well as his developmental delays caused doctors to recommend his institutionalisation so his parents could forget about him and move on with their lives.
Jacob Barnett: Jacob was diagnosed with ‘moderate to severe autism’ at the age of two, and his mother was told he would never learn more than the most basic skills. His language regressed at an early stage as he languished in a special education class.
Tito Mukhopadhyay: Tito was diagnosed with ‘severe non-verbal autism’ at the age of three and a half. Told to keep her son busy, his mother developed the Rapid Prompting Method. Today Tito is a successful author and poet.
Emma Zurcher: Diagnosed at the age of two and having difficulties articulating herself, the prognoses for Emma were not favourable. Initially her mother was looking for ‘treatments’ and tried several unsuccessful therapies recommended by ‘experts’; however, over the years she started listening to autistic adults who introduced her to alternative means of communication. Subsequently she got in contact with Tito’s mother (see last entry) and, using the Rapid Prompting Method, enabled Emma to communicate using a stencil board and later a keyboard. Today Emma is a happy young girl attending several mainstream classes while being homeschooled. She is also a prolific writer and blogger.
Carly Fleischmann: Diagnosed at the age of two with autism, developmental delay and oral-motor apraxia, Carly’s parents were told she was ‘mentally retarded’ and would never develop past the stage of a six year old.
Daryl Hannah: As a child Daryl was diagnosed with ‘borderline autism’, and her doctors strongly recommended to medicate and institutionalise her.
Tim Sharp: He was diagnosed at the age of three, and his mother was told to ‘put him away and forget about him’, which she didn’t. A ‘specialist’ predicted that he would never learn anything, not even to speak. When his mother tried to get him interested in drawing, he picked it up immediately, and parallel to pursuing his new-found talent he also developed his speech. Today his drawings are sought after by collectors and displayed in exhibitions all over the world.
Dr Temple Grandin: She was diagnosed at the age of three and remained non-verbal until she was three and a half, but her parents refused to have her institutionalised as suggested by professionals. She found a mentor who encouraged her interests and talents, received a bachelor’s degree in psychology and a PhD in animal science and is now one of the world’s leading consultants on animal behaviour in the livestock industry.
Ido Kedar: Ido was diagnosed with ‘severe non-verbal autism’. At the age of seven he learned to communicate on a letter board, and later on a keyboard. Currently he is an honours student at high school as well as a published author.
John Hall: Diagnosed as ‘severely autistic’ and ‘slightly retarded’ as a child, John studied, earned an MBA and was awarded a doctorate. Today he is a CEO and published author with his own family.
MORE ON AUTISM