or
The Ultimate Empire
- A Short History of the United States -
- I judge people individually and hate generalisations. Still, for reasons of readability, I have used terms like the Americans when referring to the majority of Americans, the white population before the Declaration of Independence, the American government, the United States as a whole etc. The same goes for other terms like British, Indians and so on. For the same reasons I have used the term Americans for white US-Americans unless referring to the general public after 1868 or otherwise specified.
- American History is written by Americans, and I have consulted a lot of different sources to find out what really happened. If you have any additional information, or find anything to be incorrect, feel free to email me at
.
The men and women who were shipped in from Europe since then have been nostalgised and heroised as refugees who were looking for a country that offered them political, religious and economic freedom (at that time, freedom of speech was not considered more important than food, and no one had to be ashamed of being an economic refugee). And while this is true about a good deal of the immigrants, the other half isn’t mentioned at all - lawless adventurers, criminals on the run, convicted felons (many mass murderers and serial killers were given the choice between the old gallows and the New World, and not all of them picked the rope) and religious fanatics (foremost the Puritans and the Pilgrims who did happen to be persecuted, but who insisted on burning witches and finishing off all those of other beliefs and races themselves).
You can imagine that not many of these people knew how to farm, and most of the early settlers didn’t survive the first winter.
Some of them were luckier, though; they were found by Indians who fed them and showed them the skills they needed. Once the settlers got the hang of it, they shot the Indians and extended their farms.
There was land for every European at the Frontier - the most Western line beyond which no land had been claimed yet. All one had to do was go there, stake the claim and get rid of the Indians.
Of course, as in any other colony, it was also tried to enslave them. But Indians don’t last long in captivity, so African slaves were imported and the Indians exterminated.
The growing population of the East coast kept pushing northwards, and the British colonies clashed with the French territories in the North which resulted in the French and Indian War, 1756-1763 (the American side of the Seven Years’ War). For their battles, both parties repeatedly allied themselves with Indian tribes that they killed after the conflicts.
Just like your history books, I’ll leave out the massacres on Indians, but for a different reason. I feel that singling out any of these massacres (Americans call them ‘battles’ or ‘Indian Wars’) would render the impression that the random killing of unarmed civilians and the dismembering and mutilating of dead and living children, men and women was the exception. It wasn’t.
The genocide of the Indians lasted for 300 years. Over this period, they have been pushed westwards until no West was left, into ‘reservations’ that were guaranteed to remain theirs (yep, we know what to think of American guarantees).
The Frontier, initially a term applied to the most Western settlements, was signed into law in 1834 by president Andrew Jackson as the Permanent Indian Frontier that would forever separate the Europeans in the East from the Indians in the West. Of course the only permanent thing about it was that the Frontier was permanently moved westwards until it disappeared in the Pacific with the Wounded Knee Massacre in 1890.
There are many supposedly amusing stories about Indians selling land for glass beads and the like. According to British (and later American) law these people were considered aliens (!!!) - they had no citizenship and therefore couldn’t own property in the first place. Apart from that, if someone put a gun to your head and asked you to sell your Rolex for a dime, what would you do?
Many governments paid a reward for every killed Indian (usually the reward for adult males was higher than for children and women). Of course they demanded proof, and some governors got so fed up with the Indian corpses in their offices that they declared their scalps to be sufficient proof. (A handful of Indians copied this habit and created the myth of the savage scalp-hunting Indian.)
Apart from the old shotgun, the Americans used other methods as well, such as providing them with alcohol, knowing it would kill them. One of the most gruesome was to appear charitable and provide them with blankets they had infected with smallpox.
(Some sources contend that the infections were unintentional. This is not the case.
William Trent, commander of the local militia at Fort Pitt, wrote in his journal during the 1763 siege: 'We gave them two Blankets and an Handkerchief out of the Small Pox Hospital. I hope it will have the desired effect.' – It did.
A few weeks later, unaware that someone else had put the same strategy into place and that the smallpox were raging amongst the Indians already, Colonel Henry Bouquet suggested to Lord Jeffrey Amherst: 'I will try to inocculate the Indians by means of Blankets that may fall in their hands, taking care however not to get the disease myself. As it is pity to oppose good men against them, I wish we could make use of the Spaniard's Method, and hunt them with English Dogs. Supported by Rangers, and some Light Horse, who would I think effectively extirpate or remove that Vermine.' - Amherst replied: 'You will Do well to try to Innoculate the Indians by means of Blanketts, as well as to try Every other method that can serve to Extirpate this Execrable Race.')
Around the same time, the United States claimed Oregon, the area Northwest of the Louisiana purchase, up to 54°40 from Great Britain who claimed it for Canada. After the war against Great Britain, the United States themselves had suggested the 49th parallel as the border (which was accepted in the Treaty of 1818), but now that was not good enough any more.
And since Polk had expanded the US territory so far into the South, the Northerners expected him to put the same effort into Northern expansion. Their slogan was ‘54°40 or fight!’ (short, aggressive, catchy and unimaginative - you can almost see the cheerleaders).
However, years of negotiations and joint government in Oregon didn’t bear any fruit, and in 1846 the Oregon Treaty was signed, setting the border at 49°, with only a few adjustments to the Treaty of 1818.
In his First Inaugural Address in March 1861, he repeated his guarantee of having ‘no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery’.
In the same speech, he also endorsed the Corwin Amandment (‘No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.’) which Congress had passed under outgoing President Buchanan as a last-ditch effort to keep the Union together, and which would have guaranteed the states’ right to remain (or become) slave states. Lincoln said: ‘Holding such a provision to now be implied Constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.’
(Technically, the Corwin Amandment is still awaiting ratification.)
Virginia offered to abolish slavery if Lincoln would recognise their sovereignty; of course the answer was no.
All Union forces were sent away from the Confederate States, but the soldiers in Fort Sumter refused to leave.
Virginia, North Carolina, Arkansas and Tennessee joined the Confederation.
What followed is usually called the ‘American Civil War’, a term as incorrect as the word ‘Indians’ for the real Americans. A civil war is a war between two (or more) rivalling parties striving for power in one nation or province; this was a war between two nations, the United States of America and the Confederate States of America which they intended to annex. For this purpose Lincoln introduced male slavery (‘conscription’) for the working classes in the US (the better-off could buy themselves out with $200), an institution that would last for more than 100 years.
The Confederation called for assistance from Europe, but to no avail. The Americans hadn’t made many friends there (Americans, until this day, make slaves and not friends), and the idea of them tearing each other apart seemed very appealing (especially to Great Britain).
In order to have a united front against the Confederation, Lincoln admitted members of all factions to his cabinet, including the Radical Republicans. These were the handful of abolitionists in the Congress who successfully took the opportunity to promote their cause and were determined to use the war to put an end to slavery. The most influential ones were Charles Sumner and Thaddeus Stevens, who was also the most radical of them all: not only did he demand freedom and equality for all Afro-Americans, he even went as far as including Asians, Jews, Hispanics, Irish, women and - most extremely - Indians.
In 1862, U.S. Congress (at this stage only consisting of Northerners) refused to pass a constitutional amendment abolishing slavery. And later that year, when preparing the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln wrote: ‘My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union.’
And his General U.S. Grant stated: ‘If I thought this war was to abolish slavery, I would resign my commission, and offer my sword to the other side.’
Things looked bad for the Union, and Lincoln decided to stir up the South by making the slaves turn against their masters: in 1863 he proclaimed the end of slavery in the Confederation (and no, he did not free a single slave within his jurisdiction in his lifetime). Besides trying to incite a slave revolt in the Confederation (which could easily have backfired if the slaves of the Union had joined them), he also hoped to get support from Europe by giving the impression this war was about slavery. Neither happened.
But his luck changed with the appointment of General William Tecumseh(!) Sherman (who was infamous for abusing his slaves). Lincoln gave him the order to ‘Kill and Destroy’, and that’s exactly what he did! He left the Confederate troops where they were and marched through the countryside with an army of plundering and marauding soldiers, burning absolutely everything and everyone in his path, leaving behind a trail of blood and complete destruction. His ‘scorched earth’ policy and his deliberate targetting of civilians earned him a place in history books as the first modern general. - That’s how the South was won.
Soon the freed slaves flooded into the North from the destroyed plantations in the South. Needless to say they weren’t welcome. (At the same time, a flood of carpetbaggers was moving in the opposite direction.)
Five days after the Confederation’s surrender, on Good Friday 1865, Lincoln was shot. He died the following morning.
Union General Benjamin Butler had asked the President what was going to become of the millions of slaves that were freed in the Confederation, to which Lincoln replied: ‘I think we should deport them all.’
This sounded good in theory. But in the 50 years of its existence, the American Colonization Society had removed 15,000 freed slaves from US territory - now they faced the deportation of more than four and half million freedmen, a task that was completely unfeasible, technically as well as financially. It was considered to give them an isolated area within the United States or in South America, but no state was willing to give up part of its territory.
The freed slaves still had no rights. They were heavily fined for not finding work, those who couldn’t pay the fine (guess how many of them could) were imprisoned, and those imprisoned could be hired out for work - which, in my humble opinion, is nothing short of slavery.
Eight months after Lincoln’s death, on December 18th, 1865, the 13th Amendment abolished slavery in the whole of the United States. From this day, the slaves of Kentucky, Maryland, Delaware and Missouri (the slave states that hadn’t joined the Confederation) were free as well.
In 1866 the Ku Klux Klan was founded in the South, aiming - just like the colonizationists in the North - at a purely white Protestant American society. Abolitionists and Afro-Americans (amongst other minorities) were permanently terrorised and murdered.
Riots and street battles caused by racists attacking freedmen remained a common sight for decades.
Seeing they had no possibility of getting rid of the Afro-Americans, the Republicans - who feared a defeat in the upcoming elections - decided to use them as ballot fodder, convinced they’d vote for their unwitting liberators. In 1868, the 14th Amendment was passed (overruling President Andrew Johnson’s veto) which granted citizenship to all persons born or neutralised in the United States, except Indians.
In order to get a majority for the amendment, the former member states of the Confederation were expelled from the Union (expelled? what had happened to the supposedly Perpetual Union this war was about?) and readmitted (what a generous gesture) in 1870.
For a number of years, equal rights for Afro-Americans, including their
suffrage, were enforced. In 1870 and 1871, Congress passed a number of Force Acts, making the use of terror, the intimidation of voters, the attempt to prevent anyone from excercising their civil rights etc. a federal offence. Hundreds of KKK members and supporters were tried an convicted, and soon the others went into hiding. The Ku Klux Klan was dead - for the time being.
After the Reconstrucion Period ended in the early 1870s, the South fell back to the racists who passed Jim Crow laws to disfranchise the freedemen and who applied a ‘separate but equal’ segragation policy, denying Afro-Americans the use of the same services and facilities as white Americans.
This policy was upheld by the US Supreme Court in 1896 (Plessy v. Ferguson).
In 1883, the Supreme Court also ruled that the 14th Amendment only forbids discrimination by the state, not by individuals; official segregation went on for another century (until a Supreme Court ruling in 1957), and their voting rights were restricted until the passing of the Voting Rights Act exactly 100 years after the war (when federal police finally stopped local police from hindering them to vote).
America always had an eye on Cuba, and it watched with interest how it got more and more difficult for the Spanish to suppress the Cubans. By 1898, the civil war was in full swing, and as the Spanish empire was falling apart all over the world, they felt their time had come.
The United States offered to negotiate between them, but their ‘help’ was declined.
They decided to send a battleship anyway, and on February 15th, 1898, the Maine anchored in Havana.
The same evening, the Maine was blown up, and 266 soldiers were killed; the cause has never been established.
Several theories are still spread - the accidental explosion of the fuel tank for example, or an attack by Cuban rebels trying to blame it on the Spanish and get the US involved on their side (which doesn’t really make sense as they had declined US intervention before).
But the main theories claim it was an attack by the Spanish (though they wouldn’t have had a reason to conceal their identity), or that the ship was blown up by US forces themselves in order to justify a war, which is the only one that sounds plausible to me.
However, the United States blamed the Spanish and declared war. In their view, Spain had started the hostilities by the supposed attack; the Americans have always made a big deal about the ‘first shot’, and they have worked out a lot of ways to let others fire it. In my opinion, a war starts either with a declaration of war or with armed forces entering foreign territory (or refusing to leave it, as was the case in Fort Sumter). This war, as I see it, started with an American battleship entering Cuban waters, regardless of the cause of the explosion.
The war against Spain spread over several colonies and ended only eight months later with the American annexation of Cuba, the Philippines (for which they paid $200,000,000 to Spain), Puerto Rico, the Wake Islands and some of the Samoan Islands.
Resistance of the populations against American occupation remained as fierce as it was against the Spanish, and the atrocities committed by the US forces were nothing short of what their predecessors had done to them. (The Philippines had declared their independence on June 12th, but nobody took notice.)
With the new century approaching, the US decided to become a world power rather than just meddling in the businesses of Northern and Southern American countries, and in 1900 they assisted European powers in the bloody suppression of the Boxer Rebellion in China in which the Chinese tried to regain control of their country.
On this occasion the United States created the term ‘Open Door Policy’, meaning that the US and the European countries may exploit all other countries equally. (Around this time Mark Twain suggested to replace the American flag with a skull-spangled banner.)
After McKinley’s successful assassination in 1901, Theodore Roosevelt became president. His first project was the completion of the Panama Canal which would connect the Atlantic with the Pacific, so no one had to sail around the tip of South America any more. It had been started by the French, but after the company went bankrupt in 1888, nobody had worked on it.
Roosevelt purchased the rights to complete it from France, only to find out that France was not entitled to sell them.
In 1903, he negotiated with Colombia in whose territory the Canal was planned, but the government bluntly refused permission.
No problem for Roosevelt: he organised a rebellion in the Colombian province of Panama where the canal was planned and sent the US Navy to assist them. Two weeks later Colombia was defeated, Panama declared its independence, and the works (which were completed in 1912) commenced.
In 1906, he has been awarded the Nobel Peace Price; not for this, of course, but for his negotiations in the Russo-Japanese War.
He still lives in every children’s room: the Teddy Bear was named after him, following an anecdote in which he refused to shoot a bear that had been tied to a tree for him - in his opinion big game, other than Indians, deserved a ‘sporting chance’.
Germany, in the meantime a theoretically perfect democracy, had faded from the mind of the Americans. It was nothing more than an unreliable income source for the ‘reparations’ it owed (economically destroyed and with a starving population, it was hardly able to pay the interests of its debts), and no one really cared about what happened to it.
But democracy doesn’t go well with starvation: fourteen years after the United States had laid their egg in Versailles, the monster hatched. Hitler, an Austrian hobo whose shrill voice and low intellect had made him the undisputed leader of the NSDAP, appeared on the scene. In 1933, his party got 43.9%, and with the votes of the conservatives (including that of post-war chancellor Adenauer) the ‘Enabling Act’ was passed which gave his government unlimited powers to ‘save the country from its enemies’.
The Americans didn’t care. Okay, okay, he refused to pay the ‘reparations’, but a strong Nazi Germany would keep the Soviets out of Europe. Hitler hated Communists, and he hated Jews - so what was the problem?
But there were warning voices as well, foremost that of Roosevelt who was aware that Hitler would not only reclaim the lost territories but also aim at dominating the European continent. Another power to be taken into account was the USSR. Roosevelt was disappointed that the United States who had proven to be the leading power had retired from world politics rather than looking for new conquests.
When the chance came to get involved, like in the Civil War in Spain, Congress reacted by passing Neutrality Acts that prevented the United States from even delivering weapons to belligerent countries (of course, Roosevelt and the armament industry found ways around that, which finally were legalised by the Lend-Lease Act in 1941).
When the Second World War broke out in 1939, the French, British and Dutch had to focus their military activities in Europe which weakened their position in the Asian colonies. Many of these started to fight for independence, but other powers saw their opportunity to take them over: Japan, China and the United States.
Japan reacted promptly by invading Indo-China. In return, Roosevelt placed an oil embargo on Japan which heavily relied on oil, and two months later, in September 1940, Japan signed a treaty (‘Tripartite Pact’) with Germany and Italy requiring them to fight against each others’ enemies.
Roosevelt’s best bet was to get Japan to attack the United States - in that case, Germany would have to get involved, and he could send American troops to both Indo-China and Europe.
The embargo had paved the way, but still Japan didn’t react the way it was supposed to. On November 26th, 1941, Roosevelt set them an ultimatum to withdraw all their troops from the occupied territories.
US intelligence, as well as others who notified the United States (Great Britain, the Netherlands, Australia, Peru, Korea and the Soviet Union), had decoded, in every detail, Japan’s plans of a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor and informed President Roosevelt. Between November 27th and December 5th, the essential war ships (all US carriers with their patrol and pursuit planes as well as the destroyers) were removed from Pearl Harbor, leaving it only with an obsolete fleet. (As FDR said himself, "Most of the fleet was at sea... none of their newer ships were in harbor.")
On December 6th, 1941, Japan declared war on the United States and a few hours later, on the morning of December 7th, attacked the completely unprepared US Naval Base in Pearl Harbor, killing an estimated 2,400 men. Roosevelt had reached his aim: the United States were at war, and the outraged American public was calling for revenge!
In the meantime, Hitler’s breach of the Non-Aggression Treaty with Stalin by invading the USSR led to its unlikely alliance with Great Britain before being joined by the United States. Now any megalomaniac in his right mind would be concerned about facing the United States on top of two dozen enemies that include the USSR and Great Britain, but not Hitler. It is reported that he literally jumped for joy when he got the news, and he declared war on the United States on December 11th.
The Germans and British had already commenced what would become the warfare of the future, and the Americans were only too happy to embrace the new strategy: instead of soldiers killing soldiers, air raids were carried out on large cities, killing thousands of civilians without putting one’s own people in danger; at the same time it destroyed the enemy’s already damaged economy.
The war spread over three continents - Europe, Africa and Asia - and left half of the world in ruins. An estimated 60 million people got killed, the vast majority being civilians.
Roosevelt was insistent to talk to Stalin in person, and the Soviet leader finally agreed to a meeting in Tehran in November 1943 and another one in Yalta in February 1945.
Descriptions of Roosevelt’s attitude towards Stalin range from conciliatory to servile, yet before the war he had portrayed him as a dangerous dictator. Most historians put this down to senility, but I am convinced that Roosevelt had worked out a detailed post-war plan for the world already, and he pussyfooted around Stalin in an effort not to endanger it.
After the defeat of Germany and Japan (Italy had surrendered already), the United States once more would emerge as the world’s leading power, followed closely by the USSR. I am certain that at this stage Roosevelt had the vision of an American empire covering all countries between the poles; but he knew that the time wasn’t ripe.
There were two possible scenarios for the post-war world: one was that a couple of empires would continue gaining and losing territories, creating alliances and fighting wars, and this was too much of a risk for American supremacy; the second was to divide the planet amongst the two strongest powers and then work on the other’s downfall, and that’s what he aimed at. A mastiff has a better chance against another mastiff than against a pack of hyenas.
For this purpose he intended to set up the United Nations; he was aware that they’d be as powerless as the League of Nations was, because the strongest countries would have to be given a veto, but they would succeed in preventing the emergence of other superpowers beside the US and the USSR.
(Oh yes, Churchill was at these meetings as well. But his presence was merely symbolic; in both World Wars he had schemed to get the United States involved at the earliest stage, demonstrating Great Britain’s dependence on them. Apart from that, Britain was actually the big loser of the war - within a few years, they lost most of their colonies, including India. To my knowledge, Great Britain was the first country ever to be colonised by one of its former colonies.)
However, Roosevelt couldn’t openly discuss his vision of American world rule, and many of his subjects who didn’t grasp his subtle master plan thought he sympathised with Communism. He died of a heart attack on April 12th, 1945, just after having been re-elected for a fourth term, and just before the defeat of Germany; maybe the excitement of finally reaching his aim was too much, but I wouldn’t be surprised if one of his oblivious fellowmen had been involved, thinking he was doing damage control before the post-war conferences.
Roosevelt’s vice-president Truman succeeded him and met with Stalin in Potsdam to ask for his support against Japan, discuss the world’s future and distribute the loot.
After their unconditional surrender on May 8th, 1945, Austria and Germany were divided into four zones (the American, British and French zones in the West and the Soviet one in the East), and so was the German capital Berlin itself, which lay in the centre of the Soviet sector.
After the disastrous result of the last German defeat, and fearing the spread of Communism, the Americans decided to introduce a new system of domination: rather than plundering the defeated European countries and leaving them on their own, they let them work for the United States while allowing them to elect governments that acted within their rules. This was called the European Recovery Program, known as Marshall Plan.
The West Germans were leniently punished - at the Nuremberg Trials the figureheads of the Third Reich (who hadn’t committed suicide like Hitler or Goebbels) were executed, and a few others were sentenced to long prison terms which were suspended after just a few years.
The others got away; the Americans, with their knowledge of the German mentality, rightly believed that they had just been carrying out Hitler’s orders, and that they would serve the US just as enthusiastically. Thus it was still possible for an official who was in charge of death camp transports to become President of West Germany (or of Austria, for that matter).
A number of Nazi criminals were also employed by the US (such as Klaus Barbie, the Butcher of Lyon, who was recruited by the CIC in 1947 at the time he was sentenced to death in France).
The Americans generously (yes, this is an ambiguism) invested in the destroyed countries, set up American businesses, helped them manage their debts and taught them of the dangers of Communism (and for those who didn’t listen they got out the cane). The American economy (which had been booming since entering the war) kept on booming, the West Germans had their Wirtschaftswunder, the British colonies got their independence: the war had done everyone a world of good!
Well, maybe not the other countries... After 1945, no nation was able to remain completely neutral (apart from Switzerland, where the Communists and the Capitalists had their offshore bank accounts). Any country claiming independence was either sacked by one of the superpowers, or accused of having been sacked by the other one - this would lead to sanctions and embargoes that automatically forced them to establish ties with the other one, making them more or less dependent on it.
Also, many satrapies declaring their independence were immediately invaded (‘liberated’ or ‘protected’) by their original owners to re-establish their rule, esp. those providing crucial materials and those located on their doorstep. South American countries, for example, had been exploited by US companies and citizens for ages, and every emerging democracy was at once removed by the United States, like Guatemala in 1954, the Dominican Republic in 1965, Bolivia in 1967, Chile in 1973, Honduras in 1975 or Nicaragua in 1980.
The one nation that hadn’t surrendered by May 1945 was Japan. But once the war was over in the West, the US were able to focus on Asia, and after some major victories negotiations for Japan’s surrender were under way.
This put Truman under a lot of pressure: the United States had just finished building the atomic bomb, and this could be the last opportunity in a long time to test its effects under authentic conditions.
On August 6th, 1945, the first atomic bomb (uranium) was dropped on Hiroshima, killing a quarter of a million people instantly or after weeks of agony, and crippling, disfiguring or causing cancer to millions of others. On August 8th, the USSR thought it safe to declare war on Japan, and on August 9th another A-bomb (plutonium) was dropped on Nagasaki - it slightly dropped off target, thus only killing an eighth of a million people instantly or after weeks of agony, and crippling, disfiguring or causing cancer to millions of others. The most macabre experiment in history was concluded, and on August 14th, Emperor Hirohito surrendered unconditionally.
After having been humiliated in the Bay of Pigs, Kennedy had to prove himself: ‘Now we have a problem in making our power credible,’ he said, 'and Vietnam looks like the place’.
Vietnam, which was part of French Indo-China, had been invaded by Japan after France surrendered to Germany in 1940, and the Vietminh, led by Ho Chi Minh, had started an independence war, strongly supported by the USSR and - after its WWII entry - the United States.
In 1945 the US’ most important supplier of rice and heroin had finally kicked out the French and Japanese and proclaimed the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. What they didn’t know was that in Potsdam they’d been partitioned and given away to China (North) and Great Britain (South).
A year later, both countries traded Vietnam back to France which was defeated by the Vietminh in 1954 and capitulated.
At a conference in the same year the United States, the USSR, Great Britain, France and China (Vietnam wasn’t represented, of course) decided to divide Vietnam again, give the North to the Vietminh and put the fascist dictator Ngo Dhin Diem (whom the French themselves described as ‘not only incapable but mad’) in charge of the South. It was also decided that free elections in both parts be held before July 1956.
The Vietminh reluctantly agreed to the cease-fire. But when Diem refused to hold elections, claiming the Vietminh would cheat anyway, and the advisors of US President Eisenhower informed him that free elections would give Ho Chi Minh anything from 80% upwards, the elections were cancelled.
At this point the Vietminh took up its guerrilla activities again, and in 1960 it joined forces with other groups to form the National Liberation Front (NLF), also known as the Vietcong.
As the United States, just like the USSR, didn’t tolerate independence, they claimed North Vietnam was a satellite state of the USSR, and between 1961 and 1963 President Kennedy (who called the Cold War ‘a holy war’) sent 20,000 military advisors and 7,000 troops to South Vietnam who should help them conquer the North.
Shortly after Kennedy’s assassination, his successor Lyndon B. Johnson (‘LBJ, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?’) launched a full-scale war on North Vietnam, involving Cambodia and Laos as well. As the NLF were armed and dangerous, most actions were directed against civilians in form of area bombardments, using napalm and the chemical Agent Orange (a defoliant which conveniently killed people as well). During the Vietnam War, the United States dropped more bombs than in the Second World War.
The amount of US casualties went far beyond their imagination, due to advanced guerrilla tactics and the population’s support of the NLF. Many of the aircraft that brought the troops in transported heroin to the States on their way back (that way the war did pay off, though not for everybody).
It was the first (and only) war ever to be televised in the US, so Americans could order a pizza, grab a beer, sit back and watch crying children running through their destroyed villages while burning to death. But it had an unwanted effect on a lot of people: they realised that war wasn’t something abstract, and that all these atrocities happened to actual people. Opposition to the war increased rapidly, especially with over 60,000 US soldiers having lost their lives (as opposed to 3 million Vietnamese, 7% of which were armed) in a war that was started merely to boost Kennedy’s damaged ego.
In 1973, the United States had lost their first war. As a consequence, war journalism was being restricted from showing victims and, due to public pressure, male slavery (‘conscription’ or the ‘draft’, as it is called in America) was abolished for a few years; draft registration was re-introduced by President Carter in 1980 ‘in case of a crisis’.
President Ford tried to revive US employment in 1975, but without success.
In Iran, which had been terrorised by its leader Shah Reza Pahlavi for almost four decades, opposition to the monarchy increased rapidly, despite police shooting into the crowds of protesters. He had allowed the country to be shamelessly exploited by the United States while torturing and killing all critics and opponents of his regime.
He had to flee the country in January 1979 and was welcomed in the United States which provided him with free medical treatment.
There were emerging democratic voices in Iran, but the overwhelming majority hailed the return of Ayatollah Khomeini from exile, a radical fundamentalist who created an isolationist Islamic state.
Riots all over Iran continued for over a year, and massacres on Khomeini’s opponents became a regular feature.
In November 1979, an angry mob stormed the US embassy in Tehran and took the remaining staff hostage, demanding Pahlavi’s extradition to try him for his crimes.
The negotiations led nowhere as President Carter refused the exchange; when the Iranian despot died of cancer in July 1980, the kidnappers demanded $60 billion instead.
In 1981 Ronald Reagan left Hollywood to become President, and his first action in office was freeing the remaining 52 Iranian hostages after 444 days in captivity. The official part of this deal was the return of all Iranian assets that had been frozen by Carter as a retribution; the unofficial part was the trade of weapons to Iran, the proceeds of which Reagan used to support terrorists in Nicaragua (the ‘Iran-Contra Affair’).
Also in 1979, US protégé Saddam Hussein took over the reigning Ba’ath Party in Iraq. The main aims of his terror regime were the ‘reunification’ of the Ottoman Empire under his rule and the genocide of the Kurds. (Kurdistan is a country entirely occupied by its neighbours Iran, Iraq, Syria, Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan, all of which are working on the extinction of the Kurdish people.)
In 1980, taking advantage of the unstable situation in Iran, Hussein used the continuous border disputes to wage war on his neighbour, and the United States supplied him with the weapons. (Just to point out the hypocrisy of it: the US provided both parties with weapons, and Iraq was provided with weapons by both superpowers.)
The war ended in 1988, with neither side having achieved anything.
During his presidency, Reagan launched an armament program unequalled in history, including his massive futuristic SDI (‘Star Wars’) Program, just in case.
The logic of those days was that if the US had the capacity of destroying the planet twenty times over while the USSR could only manage to destroy it a dozen times, they had some serious catching up to do. The arms race had reached its peak.
In 1982, General Secretary Brezhnev died. Two successors followed his example within three years, and in 1985 the Politburo elected one of its few members not suffering from old age. Enter the most tragic character of the century: Mikhail Gorbachev.
The USSR, just like their satrapies, were in dire straits. Economical mismanagement had forced them to buy more and more grain from other countries, mostly the US, and the arms race as well as the strenuous war against Afghanistan had exhausted their international financial credibility. Communism was bankrupt.
On top of this, the population had become restless. The Communists had eliminated starvation and homelessness, but at a price not everyone was willing to pay. Personal freedom was almost non-existent; everybody’s life was organised and controlled in every detail, and since the 60’s the right to travel to countries outside of the Warsaw Pact had been severely restricted, due to the amount of people heading for the ‘Golden West’. A lot of products were not available, for others there were long waiting lists, and sometimes even food was rationed. (Much of this was due to the fact that the colonies of the USSR, which covered about a third of the globe, were less resourceful than the US’ colonies.)
While trying to hold on to the achievements of Communism, Gorbachev aimed at a society that provided personal freedom, democracy and transparency. But things got out of hand: the people didn’t want to wait any longer and went on the streets, strikes and demonstrations paralysed the system, and every little province declared its independence.
In East Germany, the leading Stalinist party SED was banned; the other Stalinist parties were bought over by West German parties and in 1990 voted to be unconditionally annexed to West Germany.
To interfere the old-fashioned way by sending in troops and tanks would have defeated the purpose, and therefore Gorbachev didn’t even consider it. And as there was no other way of dealing with the situation, he just had to watch as things happened.
In August 1991, a coup of Communist Party hardliners attempting to re-establish the old order failed, but their defeat elevated the Russian President Boris Yeltsin to the position of a hero. (And I wouldn’t be surprised if he had incited the coup himself for exactly this purpose.)
In December 1992, the USSR formally disbanded, and Gorbachev delegated all his powers (including the use of nuclear weapons) to Yeltsin. I still believe that the world was never as close to a nuclear disaster as when this megalomaniac drunkard was in control, and this takes into account the Cuban Missile Crisis.
In 1993, he sent in the army to massacre the Russian parliament when they failed to vote as he had instructed them, and almost 200 MPs were killed; but he was not a Communist, and that’s what made him a democrat in the eyes of the US.
During the Cold War, the basic ideas of Socialism - providing free access to education, health care, housing etc. for everybody, regardless of their financial situation or social standing, as well as legislation concerning workers' rights, equality and so forth - led to a kind of moral competition during which the US satrapies, to a greater or lesser extent, did the same. Now, since there is no more competition around, the world returned to the strict industrial class system of the late 19th century and paved the way for the international expansion of outside-the-law employers like Walmart and Lidl.
To choose a single nation would have been silly, because after its defeat a new enemy would have to be found; this only left a race, an ideology or a religion to pick from.
As I mentioned earlier, the US support of the genocide of Palestinians had always put a great strain on their relations with the Arab world, so Bush decided to choose War on Islam.
The ideal point to start with was Iraq. Hussein (the Americans still call their old buddy by his first name) had fought the tiring war against Iran, he had used up the chemical and biological weapons the US had provided to get rid of the Kurds, and his country was worn out. He needed money - and his best bet was to get oil.
- Hussein wanted to reunite the Ottoman Empire, he needed to get his hands on oil resources, and there had always been border disputes with Kuwait; what better way of starting the war than encouraging him to invade his neighbour?
In a meeting in 1990, US ambassador Glaspie assured Hussein: ‘We have no opinion on your Arab-Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait. Secretary [of State] Baker has directed me to emphasize the instructions first given in the 1960’s, that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America!’
The Iraqi leader took the bait and invaded Kuwait in August 1990. Bush and the world were appalled, the US and the UN moved in and put a stop to it, and the Carlyle Group was saved. Bush even pretended that the United States were suddenly concerned about the Kurds.
After the war Hussein remained in office, but he was not allowed to possess biological or chemical weapons any more.
On September 11th, 2001, while the Carlyle Group were holding their annual conference at the Ritz, four passenger planes were hijacked and used as missiles against several targets in the United States; over 2,700 died.
Initially Bush intended to pin the attacks on Saddam Hussein, but his advisors convinced him that it would be impossible to create an even remotely credible link between Iraq and 9/11. So after Bush had organised the safe departure of the bin Laden family from the States (while all other aircraft were still grounded) he blamed Osama bin Laden, one of Daddy’s mates from the Carlyle Group, and declared war on Afghanistan (whom he accused of harbouring him), stressing that in international relations no proof was needed to convict a suspect.
(Speaking of the Carlyle Group: George Bush junior himself had been put in charge of its catering wing for a while which consequently was sold off for being unprofitable; obviously the running of a business, other than the running of the United States, requires organisational skills.)
There are four points that seem quite dodgy to me:
1. The first plane crashed into the Northern tower of the World Trade Center with such a precision that it hit the exact spot at which it would cause the entire tower to collapse. The second plane crashed into the Southern tower of the World Trade Center with such a precision that it hit the exact spot at which it would cause the entire tower to collapse. The third plane scratched the Pentagon, destroying some new offices that were not occupied and didn’t contain any equipment or information. (The forth plane, meant to hit the United States Capitol, didn’t reach its target; some heroic passengers and crew members who had heard of the other planes took control of it and crashed it in a field.)
2. Nobody claimed ‘responsibility’ (I never understood how anyone massacring civilians could use this term) for the attacks.
3. The only survivor associated with the plot had to be acquitted by the German courts because the United States denied access to their information.
4. At the time of the attacks, Bush was visiting a school. After having been informed of the situation, he didn’t show any reaction at all and absent-mindedly kept listening to the kids reading The Pet Goat to him. He didn’t even increase his own security – he obviously was aware that he himself was not in any danger.
Now I would expect anyone who is able to plan attacks on civilian targets with such precision to plan his attacks on military targets with equal precision - unless he doesn’t intend to do any damage.
Terror is supposed to spread fear, and it is spread so the terrorists would be feared. (Apart from this, attacks are usually followed up with certain demands.) Terrorist attacks without anyone claiming what they call responsibility don’t make sense at all.
And finally, I think that countries that were shaken by attacks like these would do anything to see those involved prosecuted, provided they were not involved themselves.
This leads me to believe that George Bush (who just after his election had reminded his subjects that it was not the duty of the United States to keep peace but to win wars) has masterminded these attacks himself in order to wage war on a Muslim country. Now you may doubt his intellectual capability, but Nero and Hitler were not blessed with three digit IQs, either, and got away with similar plots: Nero burnt down Rome and blamed it on the Christians, and Hitler burnt down the Reichstag and blamed it on the Jews.
Besides, as Bush was looking after Daddy’s and Uncle Osama's business, they probably gave him a hand.
The fundamentalist Taliban regime in Kabul offered to extradite bin Laden if Bush could provide proof of his guilt. Of course Bush declined.
The war against Afghanistan was over by the end of the year. Villages and cities were erased in air raids as well as the starving and war-torn population, wedding parties were wiped out, and after only a month it was considered safe to send in ground troops.
Despite all the efforts the US supposedly put into the manhunt, bin Laden was never captured. Seeing that the Bushes and the bin Ladens equally profited from the war as they provided the weapons, one seriously has to consider the possibility of both families working together.
(Bin Laden was never formally charged in connection with 9/11, and consequently the atrocities that put him on the FBI’s Most Wanted List do not include the World Trade Center bombings).
A delighful side effect of 9/11 was that Bush had no problem in eliminating civil rights by having the USA PATRIOT ACT (The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001) passed just a month after the attacks.
With the end of the war in Afghanistan approaching, Bush decided that Iraq would come next and launched a massive propaganda campaign claiming that Hussein had weapons of mass destruction again, including ‘nucilar’ weapons (if I couldn’t pronounce the word nuclear, I’d simply say atomic).
Here the United Nations butted in and got on Bush’s nerves. Created in order to prevent the emergence of other monster empires, the UN had become obsolete with the fall of the USSR, but unfortunately Bush couldn’t just dissolve them. So he offered them co-operation, provided they did as he told them.
Weapons inspectors were allowed back into Iraq and couldn’t find anything, but before they had finished their job, Bush and Tony Blair, his British Prime Minister, got impatient and decided to invade Iraq anyway.
The United States also boycotted the weapons inspectors report in the UN. Instead, they gave Hussein and his sons a 48 hour ultimatum to leave Iraq.
In March 2003 they started their air raids, dropped a Cruise Missile on Baghdad and sent in their troops.
The invasion was completed and war declared over by Bush on May 1st, and Hussein was captured in December, but fierce resistance against US and British occupation continues until this day.
Rather than celebrating the US victory, a lot of critics kept asking about those weapons of mass destruction which, even after one year of occupation, couldn’t be found, though they had served as the pretext for this war. - Didn’t these people have a job to go to?
The arrogance of the United States and its satrapies went that far that even at this point they didn’t bother planting chemical and biological weapons in Iraq, something that would have been the first thing to do in the old days.
Yet those insiders who knew that no proof had ever existed and documents had been forged were libelled and, as in the case of the British weapons inspector David Kelly, conveniently ‘committed suicide’ before going into detail.
The next part of the War on Islam series is only a matter of time; in December 2003, Colonel Qaddafi announced he’d destroy his nuclear, chemical and biological arsenal and invited UN inspectors into Libya in an effort to avoid a fate similar to that of Hussein.
Only days before the next historically close presidential elections in 2004, Bush’s campaign was given a final boost by thousands of absentee ballots that were ‘lost’, as well as by a guest appearance of bin Laden on American TV. He threatened the United States and thus supported Bush’s policy of fear – once again this proves to me that the Bush and the bin Laden families work together to promote their joint weapons business.
Bush won the election, which saved the lives of hundreds of thousands of unborn Americans, but which also cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of Muslim families. He has stuck to the motto of his administation which he outlined when he signed the Defense Bill in August 2004: ‘Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we!’
On the bright side, he has introduced a general health care system similar to the European ones. On the other hand, he kept the troops in Iraq and increased the troops in Afghanistan.
There is a level of sadism that is so much beyond anything human that any comparison would be macabre - the Spanish Inquisition, the Nazi’s treatment of Jews and other minorities, the Jews’ treatment of Palestinians, and the United States’ dealings with Indians and Asians are only a few examples. Since Vietnam, we don’t see the victims of US aggression on TV any more (we only get a glimpse of US soldiers firing into unarmed crowds or torturing prisoners of war every now and then), but this certainly doesn’t indicate that their atrocities have ceased and their respect for human life has increased.
We have to be aware of their terminology, though: when a white US-American talks about human lives, he is referring to that of white US-Americans. For some unknown reason he considers himself superior and his ‘race’ (to our embarrassment, it’s still the same race as the white Europeans) to be evolved above all others.
We know the type of people who feel superior and regard themselves the chosen ones: Henry VIII, Louis XVI, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Idi Amin... their superiority lay in their power, not in their ethics, intellect or anything else. And this goes for peoples as well.
Life, as Darwin and Hitler said, is survival of the fittest, and we have to deal with the fact that the United States have eliminated all competitors for world rule. But lecturing the rest of the world about freedom, morals or humanity is pure hypocrisy, and the civilised countries should measure their cultural standards against a more challenging benchmark than that of the United States.

[updated until 6249 RT (2008 CE)]